Review



tgf βr ii  (Bioss)


Bioz Verified Symbol Bioss is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Bioss manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Bioss tgf βr ii
    Tgf βr Ii, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 16 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf βr ii/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 16 article reviews
    tgf βr ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Bioss tgf βr ii
    Tgf βr Ii, supplied by Bioss, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf βr ii/product/Bioss
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgf βr ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress tgf βr type i ii inhibitor ly2109761
    (A and B) Secreted TGF-β1 quantification by ELISA assay on supernatants from D0 to D7 HuMoSC (A) and supernatant from MCF7 cells alone or in co-culture with HuMoSC, with or without treatment with <t>Ly2109761</t> (B). Secretion was normalized to D0-monocyte secretion (A). “MCF7 medium” condition correspond to basal TGF-β detected in the medium (B). (C) Heatmap comparing all significant surfaceome changes in HuMoSC compared to monocyte. (D) TGF-β western blot using Monocyte or HuMoSC total protein fractions before streptavidin pulldown (Whole Cell Lysate) or cell surface protein fractions of biotinylated proteins only (Cell Surface Fraction). α-Tubuline was used as a control for whole cell lysate loading. (E) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone or after co-culture with CD52 + HuMoSC and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. (F) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone after in co-culture with CD33 high CD52 + myeloid cells isolated from pleural effusion of breast cancer patients and differentially expressing CD33 (high or low) and CD52 and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. Data are means ± S.E.M. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test (A-B, E-F). Data are means of n = 3 independent biological replicates. (C) Log2 FC (HuMoSC/Monocyte) above 2 or below -2 (4-fold) were considered as significantly upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue), respectively. P-values were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests; P < 0.05.
    Tgf βr Type I Ii Inhibitor Ly2109761, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf βr type i ii inhibitor ly2109761/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgf βr type i ii inhibitor ly2109761 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems human tgf βr ii antibody
    (A and B) Secreted TGF-β1 quantification by ELISA assay on supernatants from D0 to D7 HuMoSC (A) and supernatant from MCF7 cells alone or in co-culture with HuMoSC, with or without treatment with <t>Ly2109761</t> (B). Secretion was normalized to D0-monocyte secretion (A). “MCF7 medium” condition correspond to basal TGF-β detected in the medium (B). (C) Heatmap comparing all significant surfaceome changes in HuMoSC compared to monocyte. (D) TGF-β western blot using Monocyte or HuMoSC total protein fractions before streptavidin pulldown (Whole Cell Lysate) or cell surface protein fractions of biotinylated proteins only (Cell Surface Fraction). α-Tubuline was used as a control for whole cell lysate loading. (E) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone or after co-culture with CD52 + HuMoSC and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. (F) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone after in co-culture with CD33 high CD52 + myeloid cells isolated from pleural effusion of breast cancer patients and differentially expressing CD33 (high or low) and CD52 and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. Data are means ± S.E.M. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test (A-B, E-F). Data are means of n = 3 independent biological replicates. (C) Log2 FC (HuMoSC/Monocyte) above 2 or below -2 (4-fold) were considered as significantly upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue), respectively. P-values were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests; P < 0.05.
    Human Tgf βr Ii Antibody, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human tgf βr ii antibody/product/R&D Systems
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human tgf βr ii antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Millipore anti-tgf-βr ii
    (A and B) Secreted TGF-β1 quantification by ELISA assay on supernatants from D0 to D7 HuMoSC (A) and supernatant from MCF7 cells alone or in co-culture with HuMoSC, with or without treatment with <t>Ly2109761</t> (B). Secretion was normalized to D0-monocyte secretion (A). “MCF7 medium” condition correspond to basal TGF-β detected in the medium (B). (C) Heatmap comparing all significant surfaceome changes in HuMoSC compared to monocyte. (D) TGF-β western blot using Monocyte or HuMoSC total protein fractions before streptavidin pulldown (Whole Cell Lysate) or cell surface protein fractions of biotinylated proteins only (Cell Surface Fraction). α-Tubuline was used as a control for whole cell lysate loading. (E) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone or after co-culture with CD52 + HuMoSC and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. (F) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone after in co-culture with CD33 high CD52 + myeloid cells isolated from pleural effusion of breast cancer patients and differentially expressing CD33 (high or low) and CD52 and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. Data are means ± S.E.M. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test (A-B, E-F). Data are means of n = 3 independent biological replicates. (C) Log2 FC (HuMoSC/Monocyte) above 2 or below -2 (4-fold) were considered as significantly upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue), respectively. P-values were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests; P < 0.05.
    Anti Tgf βr Ii, supplied by Millipore, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-tgf-βr ii/product/Millipore
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-tgf-βr ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Proteintech anti tgf βr ii
    (A and B) Secreted TGF-β1 quantification by ELISA assay on supernatants from D0 to D7 HuMoSC (A) and supernatant from MCF7 cells alone or in co-culture with HuMoSC, with or without treatment with <t>Ly2109761</t> (B). Secretion was normalized to D0-monocyte secretion (A). “MCF7 medium” condition correspond to basal TGF-β detected in the medium (B). (C) Heatmap comparing all significant surfaceome changes in HuMoSC compared to monocyte. (D) TGF-β western blot using Monocyte or HuMoSC total protein fractions before streptavidin pulldown (Whole Cell Lysate) or cell surface protein fractions of biotinylated proteins only (Cell Surface Fraction). α-Tubuline was used as a control for whole cell lysate loading. (E) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone or after co-culture with CD52 + HuMoSC and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. (F) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone after in co-culture with CD33 high CD52 + myeloid cells isolated from pleural effusion of breast cancer patients and differentially expressing CD33 (high or low) and CD52 and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. Data are means ± S.E.M. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test (A-B, E-F). Data are means of n = 3 independent biological replicates. (C) Log2 FC (HuMoSC/Monocyte) above 2 or below -2 (4-fold) were considered as significantly upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue), respectively. P-values were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests; P < 0.05.
    Anti Tgf βr Ii, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti tgf βr ii/product/Proteintech
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti tgf βr ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Arigo Biolaboratories tgf-βr ii
    Recombinant Meprin α Inhibits Activation of NR8383 Macrophages Induced by SiO 2 (A) Protein expression of meprin α, MCP-1, <t>TGF-β1,</t> <t>TGF-βR</t> <t>I,</t> <t>TGF-βR</t> II, and p-Smad2/3 was measured in NR8383 cells treated with 10, 25, and 50 μg/cm 2 silica. * Compared with control group, p < 0.05. (B) Expression of pro-COL I, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 was measured in NR8383 cells treated with SiO 2 , SiO 2 plus meprin α, and SiO 2 plus actinonin. * Compared with control group, p < 0.05; # Compared with SiO 2 group, p < 0.05. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group.
    Tgf βr Ii, supplied by Arigo Biolaboratories, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf-βr ii/product/Arigo Biolaboratories
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgf-βr ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Danaher Inc tgf βr ii
    Generation of NK-92 cells expressing chimeric TN antigen receptors. a Schematic representation of the TN chimeric receptor. TN chimeric receptor includes extracellular and transmembrane domains <t>of</t> <t>TGF-βR</t> II and intracellular domain of NKG2D. b Expression of YFP and CD56 in NK92, NK-92-TN, and NK-92-Vector cells analyzed by flow cytometry using PE-labeled anti-CD56 antibody. c Expression of YFP and surface TGF-βR in NK92, NK-92-TN, and NK-92-Vector cells analyzed by flow cytometry using PE-labeled anti-TGF-βR II antibody. The mean fluorescence of TGF- βR II expression was also shown. Data shown are the representatives of at least three independent experiments
    Tgf βr Ii, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tgf βr ii/product/Danaher Inc
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tgf βr ii - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A and B) Secreted TGF-β1 quantification by ELISA assay on supernatants from D0 to D7 HuMoSC (A) and supernatant from MCF7 cells alone or in co-culture with HuMoSC, with or without treatment with Ly2109761 (B). Secretion was normalized to D0-monocyte secretion (A). “MCF7 medium” condition correspond to basal TGF-β detected in the medium (B). (C) Heatmap comparing all significant surfaceome changes in HuMoSC compared to monocyte. (D) TGF-β western blot using Monocyte or HuMoSC total protein fractions before streptavidin pulldown (Whole Cell Lysate) or cell surface protein fractions of biotinylated proteins only (Cell Surface Fraction). α-Tubuline was used as a control for whole cell lysate loading. (E) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone or after co-culture with CD52 + HuMoSC and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. (F) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone after in co-culture with CD33 high CD52 + myeloid cells isolated from pleural effusion of breast cancer patients and differentially expressing CD33 (high or low) and CD52 and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. Data are means ± S.E.M. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test (A-B, E-F). Data are means of n = 3 independent biological replicates. (C) Log2 FC (HuMoSC/Monocyte) above 2 or below -2 (4-fold) were considered as significantly upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue), respectively. P-values were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests; P < 0.05.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Immunosuppressive myeloid cells induce mesenchymal-like breast cancer stem cells by a mechanism involving membrane-bound TGF-β1

    doi: 10.1101/2025.02.21.639264

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A and B) Secreted TGF-β1 quantification by ELISA assay on supernatants from D0 to D7 HuMoSC (A) and supernatant from MCF7 cells alone or in co-culture with HuMoSC, with or without treatment with Ly2109761 (B). Secretion was normalized to D0-monocyte secretion (A). “MCF7 medium” condition correspond to basal TGF-β detected in the medium (B). (C) Heatmap comparing all significant surfaceome changes in HuMoSC compared to monocyte. (D) TGF-β western blot using Monocyte or HuMoSC total protein fractions before streptavidin pulldown (Whole Cell Lysate) or cell surface protein fractions of biotinylated proteins only (Cell Surface Fraction). α-Tubuline was used as a control for whole cell lysate loading. (E) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone or after co-culture with CD52 + HuMoSC and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. (F) Tumorsphere formation assay of MCF7 cells alone after in co-culture with CD33 high CD52 + myeloid cells isolated from pleural effusion of breast cancer patients and differentially expressing CD33 (high or low) and CD52 and treated or not with 5 μM TGF-βRI/II inhibitor Ly2109761 or 1 μg/mL αTGF-β neutralizing antibody. Data are means ± S.E.M. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. ns, not significant. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post-test (A-B, E-F). Data are means of n = 3 independent biological replicates. (C) Log2 FC (HuMoSC/Monocyte) above 2 or below -2 (4-fold) were considered as significantly upregulated (red) or downregulated (blue), respectively. P-values were determined by unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-tests; P < 0.05.

    Article Snippet: When indicated, monocytes, HuMoSC or patient’s myeloid cells were added in each well at a 1:5 ratio (1.500 cells per well) and wells were treated with 5 μM TGF-βR type I/II inhibitor Ly2109761 (MedChemExpress) or TGF-β1,2,3 antibody (MAB1835, R&D Systems) at neutralizing concentration (1 μg/mL).

    Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Co-Culture Assay, Western Blot, Control, Tube Formation Assay, Isolation, Expressing, Two Tailed Test

    Recombinant Meprin α Inhibits Activation of NR8383 Macrophages Induced by SiO 2 (A) Protein expression of meprin α, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 was measured in NR8383 cells treated with 10, 25, and 50 μg/cm 2 silica. * Compared with control group, p < 0.05. (B) Expression of pro-COL I, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 was measured in NR8383 cells treated with SiO 2 , SiO 2 plus meprin α, and SiO 2 plus actinonin. * Compared with control group, p < 0.05; # Compared with SiO 2 group, p < 0.05. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

    Article Title: Inhibition of miR-155-5p Exerts Anti-Fibrotic Effects in Silicotic Mice by Regulating Meprin α

    doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.018

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Recombinant Meprin α Inhibits Activation of NR8383 Macrophages Induced by SiO 2 (A) Protein expression of meprin α, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 was measured in NR8383 cells treated with 10, 25, and 50 μg/cm 2 silica. * Compared with control group, p < 0.05. (B) Expression of pro-COL I, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 was measured in NR8383 cells treated with SiO 2 , SiO 2 plus meprin α, and SiO 2 plus actinonin. * Compared with control group, p < 0.05; # Compared with SiO 2 group, p < 0.05. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group.

    Article Snippet: Protein samples (10 μg) were solubilized in 5× sample buffer (AS0001-5, Seracare, USA), heated at 95°C for 10 min, centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 1 min, loaded on a 12% Tris-HCl-SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and separated for 1 h at 120 V. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (31337600, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) and then blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation overnight at 4°C with a specific primary antibody against meprin α, COL I (ab34710, Abcam), α-SMA, MCP-1 (DF7577, Affinity, USA), TGF-β1 (ARG56894, Arigo Biolaboratories, Taiwan, China), TGF-βR I (A16983, ABclonal, Wuhan, China), TGF-βR II (ARG59501, Arigo), p-Smad2/3 (8828s, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), or Smad2/3 (5678, Cell Signaling Technology), followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (074-1506/074-1806, Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, USA) at a dilution of 1:5,000 in blocking buffer.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Activation Assay, Expressing

    Recombinant Meprin α Inhibits the Fibrotic Response in Fibroblasts Treated with CM of Silica-Treated Macrophages (A) Protein expression of pro-COL I, α-SMA, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 was measured in lung fibroblasts treated with CM plus meprin α or actinonin. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group. * Compared with control group, p < 0.05; # Compared with CM group, p < 0.05. (B) Expression of α-SMA in lung fibroblasts observed by IHC staining (Bar = 100 μm).

    Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

    Article Title: Inhibition of miR-155-5p Exerts Anti-Fibrotic Effects in Silicotic Mice by Regulating Meprin α

    doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.018

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Recombinant Meprin α Inhibits the Fibrotic Response in Fibroblasts Treated with CM of Silica-Treated Macrophages (A) Protein expression of pro-COL I, α-SMA, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 was measured in lung fibroblasts treated with CM plus meprin α or actinonin. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group. * Compared with control group, p < 0.05; # Compared with CM group, p < 0.05. (B) Expression of α-SMA in lung fibroblasts observed by IHC staining (Bar = 100 μm).

    Article Snippet: Protein samples (10 μg) were solubilized in 5× sample buffer (AS0001-5, Seracare, USA), heated at 95°C for 10 min, centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 1 min, loaded on a 12% Tris-HCl-SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and separated for 1 h at 120 V. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (31337600, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) and then blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation overnight at 4°C with a specific primary antibody against meprin α, COL I (ab34710, Abcam), α-SMA, MCP-1 (DF7577, Affinity, USA), TGF-β1 (ARG56894, Arigo Biolaboratories, Taiwan, China), TGF-βR I (A16983, ABclonal, Wuhan, China), TGF-βR II (ARG59501, Arigo), p-Smad2/3 (8828s, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), or Smad2/3 (5678, Cell Signaling Technology), followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (074-1506/074-1806, Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, USA) at a dilution of 1:5,000 in blocking buffer.

    Techniques: Recombinant, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry

    miR-155-5p Decreases the Levels of Meprin α and Promotes Macrophage Activation Induced by SiO 2 Levels of meprin α, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 were measured in NR8383 cells treated with SiO 2 , and treated with agomiR-155-5p or antamiR-155-5p. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group.

    Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

    Article Title: Inhibition of miR-155-5p Exerts Anti-Fibrotic Effects in Silicotic Mice by Regulating Meprin α

    doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.018

    Figure Lengend Snippet: miR-155-5p Decreases the Levels of Meprin α and Promotes Macrophage Activation Induced by SiO 2 Levels of meprin α, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 were measured in NR8383 cells treated with SiO 2 , and treated with agomiR-155-5p or antamiR-155-5p. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group.

    Article Snippet: Protein samples (10 μg) were solubilized in 5× sample buffer (AS0001-5, Seracare, USA), heated at 95°C for 10 min, centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 1 min, loaded on a 12% Tris-HCl-SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and separated for 1 h at 120 V. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (31337600, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) and then blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation overnight at 4°C with a specific primary antibody against meprin α, COL I (ab34710, Abcam), α-SMA, MCP-1 (DF7577, Affinity, USA), TGF-β1 (ARG56894, Arigo Biolaboratories, Taiwan, China), TGF-βR I (A16983, ABclonal, Wuhan, China), TGF-βR II (ARG59501, Arigo), p-Smad2/3 (8828s, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), or Smad2/3 (5678, Cell Signaling Technology), followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (074-1506/074-1806, Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, USA) at a dilution of 1:5,000 in blocking buffer.

    Techniques: Activation Assay

    miR-155-5p Decreases the Levels of Meprin α and Promotes Fibroblast Activation Induced by CM of Macrophages (A) Levels of meprin α, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 were measured in fibroblasts treated with CM derived from silica-treated NR8383 cells, and treated with agomiR-155-5p or antamiR-155-5p. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group. (B) Expression of α-SMA in lung fibroblasts observed by IHC staining (scale bars, 100 μm).

    Journal: Molecular Therapy. Nucleic Acids

    Article Title: Inhibition of miR-155-5p Exerts Anti-Fibrotic Effects in Silicotic Mice by Regulating Meprin α

    doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2019.11.018

    Figure Lengend Snippet: miR-155-5p Decreases the Levels of Meprin α and Promotes Fibroblast Activation Induced by CM of Macrophages (A) Levels of meprin α, MCP-1, TGF-β1, TGF-βR I, TGF-βR II, and p-Smad2/3 were measured in fibroblasts treated with CM derived from silica-treated NR8383 cells, and treated with agomiR-155-5p or antamiR-155-5p. Data are presented as the mean ± SD. n = 3 per group. (B) Expression of α-SMA in lung fibroblasts observed by IHC staining (scale bars, 100 μm).

    Article Snippet: Protein samples (10 μg) were solubilized in 5× sample buffer (AS0001-5, Seracare, USA), heated at 95°C for 10 min, centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 1 min, loaded on a 12% Tris-HCl-SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and separated for 1 h at 120 V. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (31337600, Roche Diagnostics, Germany) and then blocked with 5% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation overnight at 4°C with a specific primary antibody against meprin α, COL I (ab34710, Abcam), α-SMA, MCP-1 (DF7577, Affinity, USA), TGF-β1 (ARG56894, Arigo Biolaboratories, Taiwan, China), TGF-βR I (A16983, ABclonal, Wuhan, China), TGF-βR II (ARG59501, Arigo), p-Smad2/3 (8828s, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), or Smad2/3 (5678, Cell Signaling Technology), followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies (074-1506/074-1806, Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, USA) at a dilution of 1:5,000 in blocking buffer.

    Techniques: Activation Assay, Derivative Assay, Expressing, Immunohistochemistry

    Generation of NK-92 cells expressing chimeric TN antigen receptors. a Schematic representation of the TN chimeric receptor. TN chimeric receptor includes extracellular and transmembrane domains of TGF-βR II and intracellular domain of NKG2D. b Expression of YFP and CD56 in NK92, NK-92-TN, and NK-92-Vector cells analyzed by flow cytometry using PE-labeled anti-CD56 antibody. c Expression of YFP and surface TGF-βR in NK92, NK-92-TN, and NK-92-Vector cells analyzed by flow cytometry using PE-labeled anti-TGF-βR II antibody. The mean fluorescence of TGF- βR II expression was also shown. Data shown are the representatives of at least three independent experiments

    Journal: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy : CII

    Article Title: Augmented anti-tumor activity of NK-92 cells expressing chimeric receptors of TGF-βR II and NKG2D

    doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-1959-1

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Generation of NK-92 cells expressing chimeric TN antigen receptors. a Schematic representation of the TN chimeric receptor. TN chimeric receptor includes extracellular and transmembrane domains of TGF-βR II and intracellular domain of NKG2D. b Expression of YFP and CD56 in NK92, NK-92-TN, and NK-92-Vector cells analyzed by flow cytometry using PE-labeled anti-CD56 antibody. c Expression of YFP and surface TGF-βR in NK92, NK-92-TN, and NK-92-Vector cells analyzed by flow cytometry using PE-labeled anti-TGF-βR II antibody. The mean fluorescence of TGF- βR II expression was also shown. Data shown are the representatives of at least three independent experiments

    Article Snippet: Single-cell suspensions of NK-92, NK-92-TN, or control NK-92-Vector cells were incubated for 30 min at 4 °C with monoclonal antibody (mAb) against TGF-βR II (Abcam, Cambridge, MA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Flow Cytometry, Labeling, Fluorescence